Gildan New Mexico Bowl: Temple - Wyoming Preview
Seems only fair that since my adopted team has the first bowl game of the season (a mere nine days away!) that they be the first to have their exploits previewed.
A peek past the basic statistics shows a game that is unlikely to be as close as surface skimming might indicate, but then *insert "that's why they don't play the games on paper" cliche here*.
The only other time these two teams ever played each other was a 38-23 victory for the Pokes back in September of 1990, so I decided to go retro and use the 1990 helmets below the fold this time - which, interestingly enough, means essentially the current helmet with a center stripe for both teams.
Now, about the actual football...there are many questions to be answered, so lets race past the jump to see what we can divine from what has happened thusfar this season - aka "Fun With Bullet Points."
So first, let's take a look at the overall statistical matchup:
December 17th at 2:00 PM on ESPN
| TEMPLE | EDGE | WYOMING | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Offense | 679.9 (67) | TEM | Total Defense | 432.4 (99) |
| Rush Offense | 256.7 (7) | TEM | Rush Defense | 230.2 (115) |
| Pass Offense | 123.3 (117) | WYO | Pass Defense | 202.3 (36) |
| Total Defense | 315.5 (15) | TEM | Total Offense | 398.6 (50) |
| Rush Defense | 122.6 (26) | PUSH | Rush Offense | 185.1 (32) |
| Pass Defense | 192.9 (19) | TEM | Pass Offense | 213.5 (73) |
When Temple Has the Ball
Is the Temple offense one dimensional? Absolutely, but they are very good at that one dimension, running the ball. There is still some uncertainty as to whether sophomore quarterback Chris Coyer will be able to return from his shoulder injury in time for the game. It would be nice if he did, but I don't think he'll be necessary (nor do I think he'll be back if he's less than 100% for that very reason).
Between Bernard Pierce and Matt Brown, the Owls put up the seventh best rushing attack in FBS this year, and they get to face the sixth worst run defense in FBS in the Cowboys. Bowling Green's unimpressive run defense shut them down to the tune of 66 yards, and they weren't much better against Penn State. Even so, I am confident of two things:
- Temple faced three of the twelve worst FBS run defenses this season in Akron, Maryland and Ball State. They racked up 940 yards and 14 touchdowns on the ground in those games.
- At their best, Wyoming's run defense is on par with the ones I just mentioned. They gave up 200-plus rushing yards eight times, including 390 rush yards to TCU.
When Wyoming Has the Ball
Temple has seen this before - the Cowboys have an impressive freshman at quarterback in Brett Smith, who has passed for almost 2,500 yards and 18 touchdowns while competing with Alvester Alexander for the team lead in rushing yards and netting another 10 scores on the ground.
Temple struggled with a similarly versatile quarterback in Tyler Tettleton in their 35-31 loss to Ohio earlier this season, got doused by a run-focused Toledo attack, and I don't doubt they would have struggled similarly with a Chandler Harnish-led Northern Illinois squad. That being said, I'm confident in three things:
- Brett Smith is certainly no Chandler Harnish, and he's probably not Tyler Tettleton either - at least not yet.
- The only two teams Wyoming has faced with defenses that are at Temple's level (Boise and Nebraska) outscored them by a combined 50-14 and outgained them 806-312 in the first three quarters, both shutting them down until the last 10 minutes when the game was essentially over.
- The one thing teams have done consistently in Wyoming's losses is force turnovers...and guess what Temple's defense is good at?
At first glance, you see two 8-4 squads and think it might be a neat-o matchup. Unfortunately, this game is about as lopsided as it gets. I fully expect this game to play out one of two ways:
- Much like the Cowboys' games against BCS top-20 teams, they might hang around early if their defense can force a turnover or two, but eventually their porous run defense will wear down and the game will end up rather lopsided (those three losses were by an average of 35-16, with some late Wyoming scores for pride's sake).
- Much like Temple's three games against equally poor run defenses, the Owls will plow through the defense early and often, using Bernard Pierce to bruise the Cowboys into submission, and then Matt Brown to control the clock...and rack up even more yards and points (those three wins were by an average of 41-3).
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Feel Like I'm Being Hustled, All Right
Some spend too much time reading newspapers and watching television east of the Ohio River. Wyoming-Temple will be waaaay closer than some Bozos seem to think. Here is another perspective to this blog post:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/971745-gildan-new-mexico-bowl-why-the-wyoming-cowboys-will-beat-the-temple-owls
schinasea
yeah...
Quality homerrific drivel for Wyoming fans…lets see…
The Pokes defense may allow a lot of yards
Yes. A LOT of yards. In fact, San Diego State ran for 292 yards against them, and that was the FIFTH best rushing game against Wyoming’s defense. None of those five teams had a run game as good as Temple’s. I like your commenter who referred to the Nebraska game (333 yards) as one of your run defense’s better outings. You gave up 227 on the ground to flipping Weber State.
The defense forced three turnovers last week against Colorado State
A Colorado State team that had less than two turnovers three times all season.
and have a pick-six of Kellen Moore to their name
Yeah! A defensive touchdown! Which was good because the offense did nothing until it was 36-7 in the 4th quarter.
The Cowboys were plus-five in the turnover margin in their loss to TCU.
Think about that one. They were plus five in turnovers and still lost by 11. Probably because TCU ran the ball forty-seven times (66% of their plays) and gained yards on 44 of those. Hence 390 rushing yards. They were also plus five in turnovers against Bowling Green and beat them by one point. They finished the season +15 on turnovers – most of which came from those two games.
The bend-but-don’t-break mentality has been a recipe for Wyoming’s success this year.
Also key ingredients in this recipe…3-9 CSU, 2-10 UNLV, 1-11 New Mexico, Texas State (6-6 in FCS), and Weber State (5-6 in FCS).
True freshman quarterback Brett Smith… has accounted for twenty-eight touchdowns this year and has scored passing, running and even receiving touchdowns.
Actually 29 including his receiving touchdown…and the rest of the team scored nine, which is why they are 60th in scoring offense.
Wyoming Has Had a Tougher Schedule
You’re probably right about that one. But I’m not really sure “we played a tougher schedule” balances out “all of the good teams we played destroyed us.” And Temple had only one loss by more than four points, while Wyoming’s worst loss was by six touchdowns to a 7-5 Utah State team that couldn’t beat Fresno State or Colorado State and didn’t beat any other FBS team by more than a touchdown.
Maybe their defensive numbers are skewed from their tough non-conference schedule. But their run defense still got steamrolled repeatedly. And that is what Temple does best.
Don't know if it'll be THAT much of a blowout
Temple isn’t TCU or Boise State so I wouldn’t have gone with that score … but if Coyer is healthy and on, they can win by a couple scores.
Benevolent despot, Hustle Belt — SBN's MAC blog
by Matt Sussman on Dec 8, 2011 10:42 PM CST up reply actions
i reiterate.
sure, they faced several good BCS-caliber teams and got run on handily (923 yards to TCU, Boise and Nebraska). So that maybe takes their run defense from awful to just below average.
BUT
They gave up 227 to FCS Weber State and barely won on a last second touchdown. They also gave up 263 rush yards to 3-9 Colorado State and barely beat them.
Wyoming may be 8-4, but they were thisclose to being a 6-6 team with several ugly losses.
But passing ECON 202 usually isn't a cakewalk, along with 4 other classes to study for
I still don’t think its that big a deal, but something to watch for
by Brown and Gold on Dec 8, 2011 11:26 PM CST up reply actions
Finals week is cake if you studied all year
If you don’t need to cram, it’s the best week of the semester.
Benevolent despot, Hustle Belt — SBN's MAC blog
once more, for effect
so in talking about Wyomings statistically awful run defense, if I’m acquiescing and tossing out the three games against BCS opponents, what do you have?
~A run defense that still allowed 204.3 YPS (good for a tie for 106th)
~ An 8-1 team that barely beat Bowling Green, Colorado State, and Weber State. And who got absolutely embarrassed by Utah State.
That still looks an awful lot like a team Temple can manhandle, since, their second best running back is 103 yards away from 1,000
Wyoming barely beat BG, but Temple barely lost to BG.
Plus there’s the bugaboo about Temple showing up for big games. Couldn’t beat OHIO. Couldn’t beat Toledo. Best MAC win was Ball State.
I know we’re bantering about a four-score victory vs. a two-score victory, but I would not like to write this one in stone.
Benevolent despot, Hustle Belt — SBN's MAC blog
And now an argument FOR Temple blowing out Wyoming
Look at the F/+ rankings:
Temple is 23rd, ahead of teams like Clemson. Actually the highest rated MAC team.
Wyoming is 101st! A full 20 spots below the second-least efficient winning-record team. One spot above Central Michigan.
Benevolent despot, Hustle Belt — SBN's MAC blog

by 









































