College Football Rankings 2013: Was the MAC snubbed?

Dave Clawson isn't happy, his conference just can't get no respect. - Peter Casey-US PRESSWIRE

The Mid-American Conference continues to be disrespected by the voting powers, despite featuring a loaded lineup of teams.

Today marked the release of the first 2013 USA Today Coaches Poll. Despite the obvious flaws involved with the Coaches Poll, this season the it's more valuable than ever before, seeing as it accounts for one-third of the Bowl Championship Series rankings formula (in the final season of the BCS). So where did the first MAC team come in on the inaugural 2013 Coaches Poll? No. 38, NIU, which received just 19 votes.

Last season was a phenomenal year for the Mid-American Conference. Several teams cracked the Top-25 at some point in the season, and the Northern Illinois Huskies even managed to crash the BCS. Seven MAC schools played in a bowl, and two teams finished with double digit wins. Despite losing in the Orange Bowl the Huskies finished ranked No. 24 in the final Coaches Poll and return the vast majority of a team that was ranked as high as No. 15 in the BCS standings. Yet still, no love.

The Huskies slipped 14 places, falling out of the Top-25, despite bringing back a wealth of key pieces, including star quarterback Jordan Lynch. Three other MAC teams received votes, but barely. The Ohio Bobcats brought in eight, the Kent state Golden Flashes tallied three, and the Toledo Rockets managed a single vote. all told the MAC managed just 31 votes. Not a whole lot of respect for a conference that's full of talented squads.

As our very own Nick Lewis pointed out earlier today, it's not necessarily a bad place to be, and could certainly be a lot worse.

Technically he's right, it's an improvement over last season, where the Huskies received just two votes in the preseason Coaches Poll; the only MAC team to receive any preseason votes. But let's forget technicalities for a second and just look at the rankings a bit deeper. NIU returns it's entire starting offensive line, most of it's offensive weapons and a player who single-handily out gained 24 FBS offenses in Lynch. Despite all this, they might not even be the best team in the MAC, as the top half of the conference is, as a whole, improved over last years offerings.

When you put that into perspective, the lack of votes seems like a huge slap in the face to arguably the deepest mid-major football conference in the FBS.

While realistically it's unfair to expect any MAC team, including NIU, to start the season out in the Top-25, and technically the MAC was shown more love at the start of this season compared to last season, one can't help but feel as if the MAC still isn't being taken as serious as some of their other mid-major counterparts. The Mountain West for example has one team in the Top-20 and its three unranked teams that received votes out gained the four MAC teams by 3-to-1. That's not to knock the MWC, it's certainly a strong conference, but so is the MAC, whether the Coaches Poll wants to admit it or not.

On the bright side, another year like last year, and it'll be a lot harder for the the voters to ignore the MAC next season.

Below is a sortable chart of the 2013 preseason Coaches Poll, complete with teams that dropped out and those that received votes:

RANK TEAM RECORD POINTS PREVIOUS RANK
1 Alabama (58) 13-1 1545 1
2 Ohio St. (3) 12-0 1427 NR
3 Oregon 12-1 1397 2
4 Stanford 12-2 1262 6
5 Georgia 12-2 1250 4
6 Texas A&M (1) 11-2 1215 5
7 South Carolina 11-2 1136 7
8 Clemson 11-2 1047 9
9 Louisville 11-2 1010 13
10 Florida 11-2 930 10
11 Notre Dame 12-1 872 3
12 Florida St. 12-2 844 8
13 LSU 10-3 797 12
14 Oklahoma St. 8-5 726 NR
15 Texas 9-4 622 18
16 Oklahoma 10-3 620 15
17 Michigan 8-5 589 NR
18 Nebraska 10-4 426 23
19 Boise St. 11-2 420 14
20 TCU 7-6 400 NR
21 UCLA 9-5 202 NR
22 Northwestern 10-3 186 16
23 Wisconsin 8-0 172 NR
24 USC 7-6 165 NR
25 Oregon St. 9-4 135 19
Schools Dropped Out
No. 11 Kansas State (11-2), No. 17 Utah State (11-2), No. 20 Vanderbilt (9-4), No. 21 San Jose State (11-2), No. 22 Cincinnati (10-3), No. 24 Northern Illinois (12-2), No. 25 Tulsa (11-3).
Others Receiving Votes
Kansas State (11-2) 113; Miami (Fla.) 101; Michigan State 89; Baylor 80; Virginia Tech 65; Fresno State 62; Arizona State 51; Mississippi 32; Vanderbilt (9-4) 29; Utah State (11-2) 23; Brigham Young 20; North Carolina 19; Northern Illinois (12-2) 19; Tulsa (11-3) 9; Ohio 8; San Jose State (11-2) 8; Arizona 5; Cincinnati (10-3) 3; East Carolina 3; Kent State 3; Mississippi State 3; Washington 3; Central Florida 2; Arkansas 1; Arkansas State 1; Rutgers 1; Tennessee 1; Toledo 1.
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Hustle Belt

You must be a member of Hustle Belt to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Hustle Belt. You should read them.

Join Hustle Belt

You must be a member of Hustle Belt to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Hustle Belt. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker